🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a tussle between a shuttered park, public officials and advocacy groups.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated controversy over their fate often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the people who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial facility near the famous falls where they are housed threatened to end their lives unless the federal government funds the cost of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and group interactions indicate they are deeply intelligent mammals – something a former trainer discovered personally.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a position that involved building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the nuances and quirks in their characters. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing temperaments.

“One whale chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Each transformed the way I view bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales progressed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their confinement.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the park ascribes to natural mortality, but which activists say indicates the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The park did not operate to the guests over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the closure. “Concrete is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a request for comment, but earlier claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality medical attention and constant attention than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in recent months following the passing of Eos, an ailing beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the facility suspected details of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was let go not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any efforts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “immense personnel”, trucks and machinery.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports demands for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the proposal would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As the public, we know that belugas belong in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s statements reflect a wider lack of awareness of the realities of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As officials work to find a solution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for local populations.

A planned protected area in the province of Nova Scotia, which now received government approval, has proven contentious. The prospective location, which includes a large area of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could in time represent a permanent answer for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the idea of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a viable plan in the short term.

An official, head of the sanctuary project, said the site will replicate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|