🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."